You have no items in your shopping cart.
ABSTRACT
What remains unclear is the openness and inclusiveness of the process through which recipient countries determine and decide are: the priority areas of their need for TAC volunteers, their choice of where to deploy the volunteers and the extent to which institutions where TAC volunteers are deployed are aware of their country's and their own responsibilities and commitments under the TAC Scheme MOU. The following observation credited to the TAC Coordinator in Sierra Leone at the 1st TAC Biennial Week in Freetown is quite revealing. Despite this MOU, many of the benefiting institutions claim ignorance of the contents of the scheme and hence volunteers are in most places denied suitable accommodation, transportation and medical facilities as contained in the MOU. What this suggests is the need for more specific focus and study, especially of the recipient countries' official and their citizens' understanding, perspectives, and perceptions about the scheme, including its underlying philosophy.
