A MORAL EVALUATON ON THE CONCEPT OF COMMERCIAL SURROGATE MOTHERING ARRANGEMENT.

ABSTRACT

Commercial surrogate mothering arrangements involve the exchange of money for the service of carrying and birthing a child for another individual or couple. This practice raises moral concerns and prompts a need for evaluation. Firstly, one must consider the autonomy and agency of the surrogate mother. Critics argue that paying women to be surrogates commodifies their bodies and exploits their vulnerable situations. This viewpoint emphasizes the potential for coercion or financial desperation that may lead women to make decisions they otherwise would not consider. Another perspective is that commercial surrogacy can be seen as a choice that empowers women and allows them to exercise their autonomy. Proponents argue that women should be free to make decisions about their bodies and that determining the value of their service through monetary compensation is not inherently exploitative. In addition to the concerns about the surrogate mother, there are also ethical considerations involving the intended parents. Some argue that commercial surrogacy enables individuals or couples who are unable to have children biologically to fulfill their desire for parenthood. They emphasize the positive outcomes of creating families through this arrangement. However, others believe that commercial surrogacy commodifies the creation of life and treats children as products to be purchased. Opponents argue that this undermines the inherent dignity and worth of human beings by reducing them to objects of transaction. Overall, the moral evaluation of commercial surrogate mothering arrangements is complex and multifaceted. It requires careful consideration of factors such as autonomy, exploitation, and the value placed on human life. Ultimately, the conclusions drawn will depend on individual ethical perspectives and values.